Usuario:Henry Delforn

Henry González Delforn, Ingeniero Eléctrico (interés matemático).

Physicist Robert B. Laughlin wrote:

   "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo."

THE FOLLOWING IS PURE TABOO

All sufficiently high energy collisions in spacetime create temporary raptures or tears in the quantum vacuum 'fabric' (the aether, if you must), rapturing extra-dimensions in space (as in other than the 3 space dimensions xyz) which in turn allows energy from those extra-dimensions to filter or leak into our 3-dimensional spacetime and this leaked energy becomes evident as the zoo of particles we observe in their brief transit of instability. These extra-dimensions of space are hidden by symmetry in time itself. In other words, any particle we can't detect for prolonged periods of time, or particles created from high energy collisions having a short life span, come from another 'world' (from extra-dimensions) unable to sustain or persist in 3d spacetime. The observed energy released from high energy collisions is not from the rapture or splitting of the colliding particles themselves but energy released from other non-3 dimensions. In this view, splitting the nuclei doesn't release its components, it releases particles from other than our 3 dimensions. The interior of the nuclei then, say the proton, is a temporary 'gateway' to other dimensions via the temporary ruptures in the aether (quantum vacuum fabric). In fact, recent experiments [1] (reported as of yesterday) confirm that the interior of a proton has characteristics of black holes. Black holes, of course, are indeed ruptures in the aether (quantum vacuum fabric), not temporary ruptures but permanent ruptures. Therefore, what we call nuclear energy is actually energy from other dimensions via or pass through the nucleus portal, not energy released from biding (strong force) nuclei energy. To think that a relatively huge amount of energy can come from holding a relatively tiny proton together (as though it had even smaller unstable components) is ridiculous. The 'nuclear energy' is 'x-dimensional energy' that funnels thru ruptures in the aether having one portal in the 3-d spacetime nuclei and the other portal in the x-d spacetime nuclei. To be clear, E=mc2 continues to be true but NOT for mass m, but for diameter d such that d is the maximum size of the hole in the torn fabric.

[1] https://phys.org/news/2022-03-interior-protons-maximally-entangled.html

Theoretical physicist Peter W. Milonni writes:

   "The basic idea here will be that the Casimir force may be derived from the source fields alone even in completely conventional QED, ... Milonni provides detailed argument that the measurable physical effects usually attributed to the vacuum electromagnetic field cannot be explained by that field alone, but require in addition a contribution from the self-energy of the electrons, or their radiation reaction. He writes: "The radiation reaction and the vacuum fields are two aspects of the same thing when it comes to physical interpretations of various QED processes including the Lamb shift, van der Waals forces, and Casimir effects."

Further reading

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_vacuum_state -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum_decay